McClymond v. Noble
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Traverse county to determine adverse claims to land in possession of plaintiff. Judgment by default was duly entered in favor of plaintiff. ■ Thereafter Aaron T. Noble appeared specially and moved to vacate the judgment; and W. E. Harrington moved to open the judgment and for permission to defend. From separate orders, Flaherty, J., denying their respective motions, Aaron T. Noble and W. E. Harrington severally appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
This is an action to determine adverse claims to a tract of eighty acres of land in the county of Traverse, brought June 26, 1899, pursuant to the provisions of Gr. S. 1894, § 5818, against David P. Noble, the person who appeared by the record to have some interest in the land, and also against all other persons or parties unknown claiming any right, title, or interest therein or lien thereon. Notice of lis pendens was made and recorded in the office of the register of deeds of the proper countj', and published with the summons in the action. An affidavit for the publication of the summons…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bardwell v. CollinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Shepherd v. WareSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- Easton v. ChildsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
- Inglee v. WellesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
3Cited by8 opinions
- McDaniel v. McElvySupreme Court of Florida · 1926
- The Title & Document Restoration Co. v. KerriganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- State ex rel. Douglas v. WestfallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- Phillips v. TompsonWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Manderfeld v. KrovitzCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.