Legal Opinion

United States v. Scott

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided July 26, 1994No. ACMR 9202111PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

WERNER, Senior Judge:

The principal question before us is whether the appellant should be exonerated of involuntary manslaughter and two assaults with a dangerous weapon on grounds either of self-defense or defense of another.1 The court members heard and observed the witnesses, evaluated their credibility, determined that the defenses were inapplicable, and found the appellant guilty of the enumerated offenses. Notwithstanding their determination, we, in the exercise of our fact-finding power under Article 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c), find…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  2. United States v. TurnerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  3. United States v. StephensonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
  4. United States v. BerriUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
  5. United States v. DumasU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. ArabArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2001
  2. United States v. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
  3. United States v. JenkinsArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2004
  4. United States v. LanierArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 1999
  5. United States v. LeakArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API