Legal Opinion

United States v. Dumas

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided February 25, 1993No. ACMR 9102440PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

WERNER, Senior Judge:

In accordance with his pleas, the appellant was found guilty of two specifications each of burglary and assault with intent to commit rape, in violation of Articles 129 and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 929 and 934 (1982) [hereinafter UCMJ]. A general court-martial com*942posed of officer and enlisted members adjudged a dishonorable discharge, confinement for seven years, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and reduction to Private El. Pursuant to a pretrial agreement, the convening authority approved only sixty months of the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Lockhart v. FretwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  5. United States v. ScottUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. LewisU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1993
  2. Longval v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
  3. United States v. JonesU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1994
  4. United States v. ScottU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1994
  5. United States v. BooneU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API