Legal Opinion
Cienega Gardens v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided August 29, 2005No. Nos. 94-1C, 94-10004C, 94-10009C, 94-10013C, 94-10029C, 98-39C, 98-3911C, 98-3912CPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LETTOW, Judge.
A 22-day trial was conducted in these two sets of consolidated low-income housing cases after the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit remanded them for trial of temporary takings claims. See Chancellor Manor v. United States, 331 F.3d 891 (Fed.Cir.2003); Cienega Gardens v. United States, 331 F.3d 1319 (Fed.Cir.2003) (“Cienega VIII”). The Court of Appeals issued its closely related decisions in Chancellor Manor and Cienega VIII on the same day. In Chancellor Man- or, the Court of Appeals reversed a trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the…
2Cases cited82 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Anaheim Gardens v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Cienega Gardens v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Brace v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- CCA Associates v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Greenbrier v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.