Legal Opinion
Anaheim Gardens v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided March 26, 2006No. Nos. 01-5011, 01-5012PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RADER, Circuit Judge.
The United States Court of Federal Claims dismissed two regulatory takings cases, Anaheim Gardens v. United States, 93-655C (Anaheim); and Algonquin Heights v. United States, No. 97-582C (Algonquin). The trial court determined that these claims are. not ripe for suit because the parties have not obtained a “final decision” from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). In light of Cienega Gardens v. United States, 265 F.3d 1237 (Fed.Cir.2001) (Cienega II), this court reverses and remands these cases for further findings of fact on whether appellants can…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- United Pacific Insurance Company, Reliance Insurance Company, and Reliance National v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Plummer v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- Steffen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021
- Walby v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
- Barlow & Haun, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.