Legal Opinion
CCA Associates v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided January 31, 2007No. 97-334CPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LETTOW, Judge.
This case raises issues that reprise those addressed, tried, and decided in Cienega Gardens v. United States, 67 Fed.Cl. 434 (2005) (“Cienega IX”), on remand from Cienega Gardens v. United States, 331 F.3d 1319 (Fed.Cir.2003) (“Cienega VIII”), and Chancellor Manor v. United States, 331 F.3d 891 (Fed.Cir.2003). Plaintiff, CCA Associates (“CCA”), is a Louisiana partnership that owns an apartment complex in Metairie, Louisiana. CCA claims that the United States *172effected a temporary taking of its property without just compensation in contravention of the Fifth…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Wensmann Realty, Inc. v. City of EaganSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- CCA Associates v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Sears v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Greenbrier v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- CCA Associates v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.