Legal Opinion
McKenna v. Whipple
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 4, 1922PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, C. J.
The complaint is in two counts: the first for a malicious prosecution, the second for a false imprisonment. The first count alleges that defendants Whipple and Averill made complaint to defendant Laird, a police officer in Putnam, charging plaintiff with being intoxicated; that plaintiff was arrested upon this charge by Laird, and locked up in Putnam; that he was on March 29th, 1921, brought before the Police Court of Putnam on said charge, and defendants testified against him, and charged him with being intoxicated, the offense charged against the plaintiff; that the charge was false and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Greenthal v. Lincoln, Seyms & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1896
- Pitkin v. New York & New England RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1894
- Commonwealth v. CheneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
- Price v. TehanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1911
- Whiting v. KoepkeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Malone v. SteinbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- State v. MobleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- State v. GarganoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
- Heating Acceptance Corporation v. PattersonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
- State v. DelVecchioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.