Legal Opinion

McCarthy v. Daunis

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided August 1, 1933PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHinman, J.

The trial court found that in the spring of 1931 the defendant Paul Daunis purchased a large German police dog, and that until February 7th, 1932, both he and the other defendant, his wife, fed, cared for and had the dog under their control and harbored him. On that date the dog, which was confined on the defendants’ lot by a wire fence so constructed as to leave meshes about six inches square, put his head through one of these apertures, seized a small dog which was' just outside the fence and pulled him against it so that the. collar of the small dog caught in the fence, leaving him hanging…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Woolf v. ChalkerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1862
  2. Granniss v. WeberSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
  3. Kelley v. KilloureySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1908
  4. McClain ex rel. McClain v. Lewiston Interstate Fair & Racing Ass'nIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Dorman v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Malone v. SteinbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
  2. Hancock v. FinchSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
  3. Stokes v. LyddyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  4. Murphy v. BuonatoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  5. Buturla v. St. OngeConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API