Legal Opinion

Swiger v. Seidner

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1996No. 95-1987PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Per curiam

Swiger asserts that he is entitled to release from prison pursuant to a writ of habeas corpus because he was charged with offenses punishable by death, i.e., two counts of aggravated murder with death specifications, but was not tried by a three-judge panel. Swiger relies on R.C. 2945.06, which provides:

“In any case in which a defendant waives his right to trial by jury and elects to be tried by the court under section 2945.05 of the Revised Code, any judge of the court in which the cause is pending shall proceed to hear, try, and determine the cause in accordance with the rules and in like…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Jackson v. McFaulOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Pewitt v. Superintendent, Lorain Correctional InstitutionOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. RuppertOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Hammond v. DallmanOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  5. In Re GentryOhio Court of Appeals · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Keith v. BobbyOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. SwigerOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. State ex rel. Brantley v. GheeOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Marshall v. LazaroffOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State ex rel. Richard v. SeidnerOhio Supreme Court · 1996

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API