Legal Opinion

Pewitt v. Superintendent, Lorain Correctional Institution

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 2, 1992No. 91-988PublishedCited by 82 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant argues that there was no evidence of record on which the court of appeals could have dismissed the case as moot and that, even if it is now moot, the appeal may be heard “ * * * where there remains a debatable constitutional question to resolve, or where the matter of appeal is one of great public or general interest.” (Franchise Developers, Inc. v. Cincinnati [1987], 30 Ohio St.3d 28, 505 N.E.2d 966, paragraph one of the syllabus.) He claims both a statutory and constitutional right to the jail-time credit he seeks, and also claims that the matter is of great public or general…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Franchise Developers, Inc. v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1987

3Cited by82 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Jackson v. McFaulOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State ex rel. Nelson v. RussoOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State ex rel. Ames v. Summit Cty. Court of Common Pleas (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Swiger v. SeidnerOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Larsen v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 2001

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API