Legal Opinion

Hammond v. Dallman

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1992No. 91-1686PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Per curiam

For the following reasons, we grant the writ, but deny relief and remand petitioner to custody.

In Lippert v. Engle (1977), 49 Ohio St.2d 281, 3 O.O.3d 434, 361 N.E.2d 239, we held that to withstand a motion to dismiss, a petition in habeas corpus must conform to R.C. 2725.041 and attack the jurisdiction of the sentencing *667court. We find the petition in this case barely adequate to meet this existing standard and grant the writ pursuant to R.C. 2725.06.2

Normally, the granting of the writ would cause us to order respondent to make a return pursuant to R.C. 2725.12 and 2725.14.3 However, we treat…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. Lawson Milk Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Byrd v. FaberOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  3. In Re GentryOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. State ex rel. Hadlock v. McMackinOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State ex rel. Spitler v. SeiberOhio Supreme Court · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Jackson v. McFaulOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State ex rel. Edwards v. Toledo City School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Gaskins v. ShiplevyOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Pegan v. CrawmerOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Gaskins v. ShiplevyOhio Supreme Court · 1995

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API