Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Richard v. Seidner

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1996No. 1996-0383PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 76 Ohio St.3d 149.] THE STATE EX REL. RICHARD, APPELLANT, v. SEIDNER, WARDEN, APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Richard v. Seidner,

1996-Ohio-54.] Civil procedure—Motion for relief from judgment—Court of appeals does not abuse its discretion in overruling a Civ.R. 60(B) motion without conducting an evidentiary hearing, when. (No. 96-383—Submitted June 4, 1996—Decided July 24, 1996.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Lorain County, No. 95CA006193. __________________ {¶ 1} In February 1987, the Cuyahoga County Grand Jury indicted…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. GTE Automatic Electric, Inc. v. ARC Industries, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Rose Chevrolet, Inc. v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Strack v. PeltonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State ex rel. Richard v. SeidnerOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Coulson v. CoulsonOhio Supreme Court · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Bank of New York v. ElliotOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Cleveland Municipal School Dist. v. Farson, 89525 (3-6-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Roberts v. Roberts, Unpublished Decision (10-15-2004)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Tarquinio v. Estate of ZadnikOhio Court of Appeals · 2011

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API