Legal Opinion
Bank of New Mexico v. Earl Rice Construction Co.
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided May 13, 1968No. 8507PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NOBLE, Justice.
We issued the following mandate in a prior appeal, Bank of New Mexico v. Rice, 78 N.M. 170, 429 P.2d 368:
“NOW, THEREFORE, this cause is hereby remanded to you with directions to set aside the present judgment and enter a new judgment which (1) awards plaintiff judgment against Earl B. Rice and Lahoma Rice jointly and severally on the promissory notes, in the amount of $64,754.80; (2) awards Earl Rice Construction Company, Inc. judgment against Plaintiff on its breach of contract claim, in the amount of $5,000.00 compensatory damages and $50,000.00 punitive damages ; and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bank of New Mexico v. RiceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- Bradbury & Stamm Construction Co. v. Bureau of RevenueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
- Stockton Theatres, Inc. v. PalermoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Snapp v. State Farm & Fire Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
- Kneeland v. American Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Genuine Parts Co. v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1978
- Green Tree Acceptance, Inc. v. LaytonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1989
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Maidment Ex Rel. MaidmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988
- Dursteler v. DurstelerIdaho Court of Appeals · 1987
- Isaacson Structural Steel Co. v. Armco Steel Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.