Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Maidment Ex Rel. Maidment

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided June 30, 1988No. 10336PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BIVINS, Judge.

In Stewart v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 104 N.M. 744, 726 P.2d 1374 (1986), the supreme court held that under New Mexico’s uninsured motorist law, an insured may recover punitive damages from his insurer if he would be legally entitled to recover them from the uninsured motorist. The case before us raises the question of whether an insured can recover punitive damages from his insurer when the uninsured motorist dies before an award is made. We hold he cannot since he would not be legally entitled to recover those damages from the estate of the uninsured…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Scott v. RizzoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Lopez Ex Rel. Lopez v. MaezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Booth v. Fireman's Fund Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1968
  4. Barnes v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
  5. Winner v. RatzlaffSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Padilla v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Jaramillo v. Providence Washington InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
  3. G.J.D. ex rel. G.J.D. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. Stinbrink v. Farmers Ins. Co. of ArizonaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
  5. GJD BY GJD v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API