Legal Opinion

Green Tree Acceptance, Inc. v. Layton

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1989No. 17800PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SOSA, Chief Justice.

PROCEDURAL SETTING

Plaintiff-appellant, Green Tree Acceptance, Inc. (Green Tree), filed its complaint for replevin against defendants-appellees, Albert and Lucille Layton (Laytons), seeking possession of a mobile home owned by the Laytons and over $40,000 alleged to be due under the default provisions of a retail installment sales contract which the Lay-tons had executed when purchasing the mobile home and which had been assigned by the seller to Green Tree. The Laytons denied the allegations of the complaint and counterclaimed, alleging that Green Tree converted to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Loucks v. Albuquerque National BankNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Bank of New Mexico v. RiceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Hood v. FulkersonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Toltec International, Inc. v. Village of RuidosoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Clovis National Bank v. HarmonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Paiz v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Allsup's Convenience Stores, Inc. v. North River InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Romero v. Mervyn'sNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Woodmen of the World Life Insurance Society v. ManganaroCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
  5. Sanchez v. ClaytonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API