Snapp v. State Farm & Fire Casualty Co.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.
The sole point involved on this appeal is whether, under the circumstances of this case, after the judgment was reversed with directions, and, pursuant to. such directions, a revised judgment was entered, interest should start to run from the date of the original judgment or from the date of the revised judgment. We have concluded that under the rules announced in Stockton Theatres, Inc. v. Palermo, 55 Cal.2d 439 [11 Cal.Rptr. 580, 360 P.2d 76], in such a case, interest should be awarded from the date of entry of the original judgment.
The problem arises under the following circumstances. The…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cowdery v. London Etc. BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Feckenscher v. GambleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Stockton Theatres, Inc. v. PalermoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Barnhart v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Snapp v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Beam v. Wausau Insurance Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 2002
- Aceves v. Regal Pale Brewing Co.California Supreme Court · 1979
- Wesley T. Bailey v. Chattem, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- Burroughs Wellcome Co. v. Commercial Union InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- General Insurance v. Mammoth Vista Owners' Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.