Legal Opinion

New v. Public Service Co. of North Carolina, Inc.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 19, 1967PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShaep, J.

The judgment of the court below must be reversed upon the authority of Burgess v. Trevathan, 236 N.C. 157, 72 S.E. 2d 231, wherein Ervin, J., speaking for the Court, said:

“Since an insurance company which pays the insured for a part of the loss is entitled to share to the extent of its payment in the proceeds of the judgment in the action brought by the insured against the tort-feasor to recover the total amount of the loss, it has a direct and appreciable interest in the subject matter of the action, and by reason thereof is a proper party to the action. . . . This being so, the insurance…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Raleigh v. EdwardsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  2. Burgess v. TrevathanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. Simon v. Raleigh City Board of Education Ex Rel. Board of TrusteesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  4. University Motors, Inc. v. Durham Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. S & N Freight Line, Inc. v. Bundy Truck Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
  2. David Wichnoski, O.D., P.A. v. Piedmont Fire Prot. Sys.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  3. Henredon Furniture Industries, Inc. v. SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANYCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API