S & N Freight Line, Inc. v. Bundy Truck Lines, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtMoRRis, J.
First Cause op ActioN' — • DefendaNt’s Appeal
Defendant argues that the demurrer should have been sustained because by the terms of the lease agreement, specifically paragraphs 5 and 14, the truck was in the exclusive possession, control, use, and management of lessee, S & N, at the time the damage was sustained and, therefore, Bundy cannot be liable under the doctrine of imputed negligence. Defendant concedes that, for the purpose of the demurrer, he has admitted the allegations in the complaint to the effect that the driver was his agent, servant and employee, but he contends that these…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Chicago, St. Louis & New Orleans Railroad v. Pullman Southern Car Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Standard Accident Insurance v. PellecchiaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- General Insurance Company of America v. FaulknerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Worden-Allen Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
- Newsome v. SurrattSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Carolina Freight Carriers Corp. v. Pitt County Transportation Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1974
- State v. DarrahSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
- Carolina Freight Carriers Corp. v. Pitt County Transportation Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1973
- David Wichnoski, O.D., P.A. v. Piedmont Fire Prot. Sys.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
- Gordon Leasing Co. v. Navajo Freight LinesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.