Henredon Furniture Industries, Inc. v. SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Judge.
North Carolina case law provides that, although an insurer who has paid part of insured’s claim “has a direct and appreciable interest in the subject matter of the action” brought by-insured against tortfeasor, Burgess v. Trevathan, 236 N.C. 157, 161, 72 S.E. 2d 231, 234 (1952), the insurer is not a necessary party to the action, but only a proper party. New v. Public Service Co., 270 N.C. 137, 153 S.E. 2d 870 (1967) ; University Motors, Inc. v. Durham Coca-Cola Bottling Co., 266 N.C. 251, 146 S.E. 2d 102 (1966) ; Burgess v. Trevathan, supra. The addition of parties where they…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Burgess v. TrevathanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Guthrie v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
- Funderburk v. JusticeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
- Corbett v. CorbettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- University Motors, Inc. v. Durham Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Concrete Service Corp. v. Investors Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Concrete Service Corp. v. Investors Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986