Legal Opinion

Henredon Furniture Industries, Inc. v. SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 5, 1975No. 7525SC496PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

North Carolina case law provides that, although an insurer who has paid part of insured’s claim “has a direct and appreciable interest in the subject matter of the action” brought by-insured against tortfeasor, Burgess v. Trevathan, 236 N.C. 157, 161, 72 S.E. 2d 231, 234 (1952), the insurer is not a necessary party to the action, but only a proper party. New v. Public Service Co., 270 N.C. 137, 153 S.E. 2d 870 (1967) ; University Motors, Inc. v. Durham Coca-Cola Bottling Co., 266 N.C. 251, 146 S.E. 2d 102 (1966) ; Burgess v. Trevathan, supra. The addition of parties where they…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Burgess v. TrevathanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. Guthrie v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  3. Funderburk v. JusticeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  4. Corbett v. CorbettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  5. University Motors, Inc. v. Durham Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Concrete Service Corp. v. Investors Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  2. Concrete Service Corp. v. Investors Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API