Legal Opinion

Cooke v. Fresh Express Foods Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 12, 2000No. 95-CV-0268; CA A101185PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

Defendants Allen John Quicker (John) and Joni Quicker (Joni) (defendants) appeal from a judgment in which the trial court found that they had acted oppressively toward plaintiff in the management and control of defendant Fresh Express Foods Corporation, Inc. (Fresh Express). As a remedy, the court ordered defendants to purchase plaintiffs interest in Fresh Express at a price that the court set. Defendants raise issues concerning both the finding of oppressive conduct and the determination of the price for plaintiffs shares. On de novo review, we affirm.

We state the facts based on our review…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Baker v. Commercial Body Builders, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Chiles v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  3. Noakes v. SchoenbornCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  4. Zidell v. Zidell, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Chiles v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hayes v. Olmsted & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  2. Hickey v. HickeyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  3. Davis v. Brockamp & Jaeger, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  4. Ballard v. RobersonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
  5. Graydog Internet, Inc. v. GillerOregon Supreme Court · 2017

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API