Legal Opinion

Chiles v. Robertson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 24, 1989No. A8309-05871; A8411-06749; CA A42591PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.

Plaintiffs and defendants separately petition for reconsideration of our decision in this case. 94 Or App 604, 767 P2d 903 (1988). Plaintiffs also petition for an award of attorney fees and assert that we are without jurisdiction to determine an issue concerning the trial court’s award of attorney fees. We allow defendants’ petition in order to discuss several factual issues. We modify our former opinion in accordance with our discussion and adhere to the opinion as modified. We deny plaintiffs’ petitions for reconsideration and attorney fees but allow the jurisdictional motion.

We first…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Chiles v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  2. Krause v. MasonOregon Supreme Court · 1975

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Lee v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  2. Loewen v. GalliganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  3. Noakes v. SchoenbornCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  4. Carey v. Lincoln Loan Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  5. Hayes v. Olmsted & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API