Legal Opinion

A.H. v. W.P.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1995No. S-5683PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COMPTON, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

A.H. appeals numerous rulings made during the course of custody litigation with her ex-husband, W.P., over their son, C.P. A.H. is suffering from an undiagnosed mental impairment that had its onset after she was awarded custody of C.P. in 1988. Since then, according to the trial court, A.H.’s actions indicate “a significant disturbance in her overall cognitive and emotional functioning.” Her behavior led W.P. to seek custody of C.P. Since the initiation of the custody modification proceedings, A.H. has taken C.P. out of Alaska twice without notice to the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Adamson v. University of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  2. S.N.E. v. R.L.B.Alaska Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Gratrix v. GratrixAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Long v. LongAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Hunt v. HuntAlaska Supreme Court · 1985

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Peterson v. EkAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Brady v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Gefre v. Davis Wright Tremaine, LLPAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Nicholson v. WolfeAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Lashbrook v. LashbrookAlaska Supreme Court · 1998

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API