Legal Opinion

Pollock v. Marshall

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 28, 1984PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHennessey, C.J.

The plaintiffs, partners of a Massachusetts law firm, 4 filed actions for attorneys’ fees against the defendants, The dataCon Companies, Inc. (company), and John A. Marshall, the administrator of the estate of Albert J. Marshall (Marshall). In their counterclaims, the defendants sought rescission of five transactions involving the company, Marshall, and the plaintiffs. The defendants alleged the transactions involved overreaching. The defendants also alleged that, in each transaction, one or more of the plaintiffs violated the duty owed to clients by attorneys. The actions were consolidated…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Building Inspector of Lancaster v. SandersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  3. Wormstead v. Town Manager of SaugusMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  4. Jones v. Town of WaylandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  5. Hill v. HallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Berish v. BornsteinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  2. Peabody N.E., Inc. v. Town of MarshfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  3. Weiss v. Statewide Grievance CommitteeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  4. Bartle v. BerryMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2011
  5. Bar Counsel v. Board of Bar OverseersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API