People v. Allen
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
Defendant was convicted of rape perpetrated upon a female under the age of consent. He moved for a new trial and his motion was denied. He appeals from the judgment and from the order of the court refusing his motion for a new trial.
Upon this appeal he presents no statement of the case nor bill of exceptions, but brings up the judgment-roll alone. None of the evidence is before us. His attack is upon the instructions given by the court. Since the defendant has failed to present to us the evidence bearing upon the instructions it must be presumed, in considering them, that they were pertinent…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. CastroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- People v. EbanksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- People v. SheldonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- People v. GibsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- People v. PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. BabcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- People v. MorandaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- People v. TriplettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- People v. Ah LungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
- People v. FraysierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.