People v. Fraysier
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. Frank H. Dunne, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.
The defendant was convicted of the crime of statutory rape. This appeal is from that judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
The defendant was a gardener making his living by growing and selling vegetables in San Francisco. His garden lay in the center of a city block shut in by fences and dwellings. Into that somewhat secluded place customers often sent their children to buy vegetables. Without elaborating the revolting details it will suffice to say that according to the testimony of the prosecutrix, a girl twelve years of age, she went to the defendant’s garden one…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. SquiresCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- People v. CurrieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
- People v. JacobsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
- People v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- People v. LiggettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. PutnamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- People v. AnthonyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- State v. PaddockMontana Supreme Court · 1930
- People v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- People v. DaseyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925