Ross v. CARLYLE ET UX

This appeal arises oat of a sait brought by Ross, as the vendor, to foreclose a contract for the sale of real property situated in Portland, Oregon. The defendants, Carlyles, as vendees, answered and by cross-complaint sought a decree of rescission becaase of the vendor’s alleged fraadalent misrepresentations upon which they relied.

The Carlyles had purchased the place, in April, 1955, for a home, making a down payment of $500 and thereafter $45 each month to principal and interest. This they continaed to do ap to the fifth day of March, 1956, when the contract was rendered in default upon…