Legal Opinion

McDonald v. Shore

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1979No. 6212, SC 25624; 6304, SC 25624PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBryson, J.

These equity cases were consolidated for trial and on appeal. Plaintiffs, 1 purchasers, brought this suit to rescind their contract with defendants for the purchase of a grocery store and related real property from defendants, the Shores, and for restitution of most of the money they had paid to defendants on the ground of defendants’ fraudulent misrepresentation, which plaintiffs relied on. Defendants sought foreclosure of the sales contract with plaintiffs for plaintiffs’ failure to make the monthly payments required by the contract.

The trial court’s final decree ordered rescission of the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Scott v. WaltonOregon Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Bodenhamer v. PattersonOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Brown Et Ux v. Hassenstab Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Schuler Et Ux. v. Humphrey Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Estate of Krueger v. RoppOregon Supreme Court · 1978

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mackintosh v. California Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nNevada Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Hampton v. SabinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  3. Gearhart v. GoehnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  4. Egeter v. West & North PropertiesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  5. MacKintosh v. CALIFORNIA SAV. FED.Nevada Supreme Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API