Legal Opinion
Rauch v. Southern California Gas Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 10, 1929No. Docket Nos. 3579, 3580PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMISON, J., pro tem.
By stipulation of the parties, the above eases were consolidated on appeal. The facts in each ease, except as to the damages, being the same.
Respondents brought these actions for damages resulting to their property from the explosion of gas, which they claim was caused by the negligence of the appellant gas company. Judgments were rendered in their favor in each of said cases, from which judgments appellant Gas Company has appealed.
On October 24, 1924, respondents Albert Rauch and Marie Rauch were the owners of a one-story frame dwelling, situated in the city of Glendale,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Merrill v. Los Angeles Gas Elec. Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
- Tompkins v. Clay St. R.R.California Supreme Court · 1884
- Kimic v. San Jose-Los Gatos Interurban Ry.California Supreme Court · 1909
- Carroll v. Central Counties Gas Co.California Court of Appeal · 1925
- Reinders v. OlsenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Finnegan v. Royal Realty Co.California Supreme Court · 1950
- Sawdey v. Producers' Milk Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
- Fishman v. SilvaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Lacy v. Pacific Gas Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1934
- Richey & Gilbert Co. v. Northwestern Natural Gas Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1943
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.