Legal Opinion
Kotlowski v. Eastman Kodak Co.
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided April 16, 1996No. 6:94-cv-06028PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
LARIMER, Chief Judge.
This discrimination case is brought pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101, et seq.; the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621, et seq.; the Equal Pay Act (“EPA”), 29 U.S.C. § 206(d); Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VIP), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.; and the New York Human Rights Law (“NYHRL”), N.Y.Exec.Law § 290 et seq.
Plaintiff Ann Kotlowski (“Kotlowski”) claims that she was laid off from her employment with Eastman Kodak Co. (“Kodak”), and denied other employment…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Carol A. Gallo v. Prudential Residential Services, Limited Partnership, Doing Business as Prudential Relocation ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Aquinas v. Federal Express Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Wado v. Xerox Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1998
- Petrosky v. New York State Department of Motor VehiclesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1999
- Menes v. CUNY University of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Adams v. Rochester General HospitalDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1997
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.