Legal Opinion

Petrosky v. New York State Department of Motor Vehicles

District Court, N.D. New York

Decided November 15, 1999No. 96-CV-0902 DRHPublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM — DECISION AND ORDER

HOMER, United States Magistrate Judge.

Plaintiff Sherry Petrosky (“Petrosky”) was formerly an employee of the New York State Department of Motor Vehicles (“DMV”). She brings this action against that agency as well as individual defendants William Achcet, Kenneth Dwyer, Melvyn Milner, Dwight Schwabrow, David Harris and George Hass 1 who served either as supervisors or co-workers of Petro-sky at DMV. Her amended complaint (Docket No. 29) 2 asserts seven separate causes of action for discrimination as follows:

Cause

of Action Legal Authority Description

1 Title VII of…

2Cases cited169 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985

164 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Feingold v. New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
  2. Feingold v. New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
  3. Eskenazi-McGibney v. Connetquot Central School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
  4. Bennett v. Progressive Corp.District Court, N.D. New York · 2002
  5. Folkes v. New York College of Osteopathic Medicine of New York Institute of TechnologyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2002

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API