Legal Opinion
Adams v. Rochester General Hospital
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided August 15, 1997No. 6:95-cv-06587PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
FELDMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff, Timothy Adams, (“Adams”) commenced this action pursuant to the American with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. (“ADA”) against the defendant Rochester General Hospital (“RGH”). In his complaint, Adams alleges that on April 21, 1994 RGH violated the ADA (and the corollary provisions found in § 296 of New York’s Human Rights Law) by terminating his employment with the hospital.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), the parties have consented to the disposition of this matter, including dispositive motions and…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Carol A. Gallo v. Prudential Residential Services, Limited Partnership, Doing Business as Prudential Relocation ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Carole Tomka v. The Seiler Corporation, Daniel Lucey, David Polonsky and Timothy ConroyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Lorenzo CHAMBERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TRM COPY CENTERS CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Valentine v. Standard & Poor'sDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Nweke v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Petrosky v. New York State Department of Motor VehiclesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1999
- Menes v. CUNY University of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Lottinger v. Shell Oil Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2001
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.