Legal Opinion
In Re Polizzi
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided May 5, 1939PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
This is an action originating in this court by way of an application for a writ of habeas corpus.
The petitioner avers an indictment and a commitment to the county jail of Cuyahoga county, for a violation of Section 13384, General Code, which is the section defining and prescribing the penalty for what is designated as “blackmailing.”
The petition avers that, on arraignment, the Common Pleas Court held the petitioner to bail in the sum of $50,000, which has not been furnished because it is excessive in amount, and in contravention of the Constitution of the state of Ohio and of the Eighth…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hoffman v. KnollmanOhio Supreme Court · 1939
- Martin v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1906
- Yutze v. CopelanOhio Supreme Court · 1923
- Ex Parte ElickerOhio Supreme Court · 1927
- In Re MartinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re HoppleOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
- Abbott v. City of Columbus, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division1972