Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Elicker

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1927No. 20671PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarshall, C. J.

This cause originated in the Court of Appeals as a proceeding in habeas corpus, the application for the writ reciting that William Elicker is restrained of his liberty by the superintendent of the New London prison farm, and that said imprisonment is without legal authority. The cause was submitted to the Court of Appeals upon an agreed statement of facts, which, in its essential parts, shows that Elicker pleaded guilty to the violation of Section 6212-15, General Code, relating to the possession of intoxicating liquors, before the mayor of the village of Lockington, in' Shelby county, Ohio,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Yutze v. CopelanOhio Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Birns v. SweeneyOhio Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Calhoun v. RussellOhio Supreme Court · 1950
  3. In Re BursonOhio Court of Appeals · 1948
  4. In Re PolizziOhio Court of Appeals · 1939
  5. State, Ex Rel. Focke v. KirkpatrickOhio Court of Appeals · 1955

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API