Legal Opinion
In Re Hopple
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided November 18, 1983No. WD-83-75PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHandwork, J.
This case is presently before the court as an original action pursuant to petitioner’s “complaint” for a writ of habeas corpus. (The writ of habeas corpus is properly sought by way of petition, not complaint. See R.C. 2725.04: “Application for the writ of habeas corpus shall be by petition * * (Emphasis added.)
An earlier appeal to this court was dismissed on October 20, 1983, for lack of a final appealable order. The particular order from which petitioner attempted to perfect his appeal had not been file-stamped in the trial court — thus leaving this court unable to determine whether…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re BursonOhio Supreme Court · 1949
- In re HuntOhio Supreme Court · 1976
- Ferrebee v. BoggsOhio Supreme Court · 1969
- State ex rel. Ferrebee v. Court of Appeals, Fourth Appellate DistrictOhio Supreme Court · 1968
- Lewis v. Public Finance Corp. of Youngstown No. 3Ohio Court of Appeals · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- City of Tallmadge v. McCoyOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
- William Cherry Trust v. HofmannOhio Court of Appeals · 1985
- Insurance Co. of North America v. Reese RefrigerationOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
- Brackmann Communications, Inc. v. RitterOhio Court of Appeals · 1987
- City of Toledo v. FogelOhio Court of Appeals · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.