Yutze v. Copelan
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.
One question presented by this record is whether a writ of habeas corpus will lie to test the constitutionality of an ordinance in favor of one who has been convicted of its violation. Upon this question there is a contrariety of opinion ■ in the various state jurisdictions. The text in 29 Corpus Juris, p. 35, and 12 Ruling Case Law, p. 1199, states that the weight of authority supports the rule that a court on habeas corpus proceedings may inquire into the constitutionality of a statute under which the petitioner has been convicted, and that if the statute proves to be unconstitutional the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Ex Parte RoyallSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Ex Parte SieboldSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Ex Parte YarbroughSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Ex Parte Tobias WatkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
- Ex Parte ParksSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Moock v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1929
- Ex Parte ElickerOhio Supreme Court · 1927
- State v. WilesOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
- Dowd, Warden v. GrazerIndiana Supreme Court · 1953
- In the Matter of FenwickOhio Supreme Court · 1924
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.