Legal Opinion

In Re Beller

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided July 3, 2002No. 02-BG-426PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

The Board on Professional Responsibility “Board” recommends that respondent, Margaret A. Beller, be suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia for thirty days as a result of her admitted failure to respond to repeated inquiries from Bar Counsel and the Board regarding three ethical complaints. By failing to respond to those inquiries and comply with the Board’s orders to respond, respondent violated Rules 8.1(b) and 8.4(d) of the Rules of Professional Conduct and D.C. Bar R. XI, § 2(b)(3). The Board furthermore recommends that reinstatement be conditioned on respondent’s…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re DelaneyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. In Re MattinglyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In Re CaterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. In Re ArtisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. In Re SpikesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. In Re EdwardsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. In Re SteinbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API