Legal Opinion
Parkinson v. Phonex Corp.
District Court, D. Utah
Decided July 5, 1994No. 91-C-0021-SPublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
SAM, District Judge.
Pursuant to a 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) reference, the magistrate judge previously heard argument and considered briefing relative to defendants’ motion to disqualify counsel for plaintiff. By order entered March 3, 1994, defendants’ motion was denied. The matter is now before this court on defendants’ motion for district court reconsideration of the magistrate judge’s Memorandum and Order. The magistrate’s decision will be reviewed under the “clearly erroneous or contrary to law standard” enunciated in 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A).
I. Factual Summary
The…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- United States v. Louis KovelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Served Upon Simon HorowitzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- Panduit Corp. v. All States Plastic Manufacturing Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Pedro v. SpedalieriCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- In Re Dresser Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Cheves v. WilliamsUtah Supreme Court · 1999
- Essex County Jail Annex Inmates v. TreffingerDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- Poly Software International, Inc. v. Yu SuDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1995
- Procter & Gamble Co. v. HaugenDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1998
- Heringer v. HaskellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.