Legal Opinion
Procter & Gamble Co. v. Haugen
District Court, D. Utah
Decided December 18, 1998No. 95-NC-94 KPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
BOYCE, United States Magistrate Judge.
Amway Corporation has made a motion to disqualify Nicholas DiFonzo as an expert for plaintiff, Procter & Gamble. The motion also requests disqualification of any counsel for plaintiff Procter & Gamble and their respective law firms with whom DiFonzo had discussions. The motion is based on the fact that Amway’s counsel had, in 1996, consulted with DiFonzo as an expert in connection with the subject matter involved in this case. It is unclear whether Amway consulted with DiFonzo initially as a consulting expert only, see Rule 26(b)(4)…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Michael F. Armstrong v. Clovis McAlpinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Hilario Mendoza-Salgado, United States of America v. Ramon Edwardo GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- English Feedlot, Inc. v. Norden Laboratories, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1993
- Wang Laboratories, Inc. v. Toshiba Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Biers v. Dentons USDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2022
- Capana Swiss Advisors AG v. Rymark Inc.District Court, D. Utah · 2025
- Christensen v. Graco Fishing and Rental ToolsDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2021
- JASON ERICH FOERSTER v. MICHELLE BLOMQUIST and CHARLES A. STORMONTDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2026
- Jack Ferm v. Agritech Properties, Inc., Don Gordon, Michael Organ, Andy Jagpal, Richard Cindric, Global Oil and Gas Recovery Corp., John and Jane Does I-XDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2026
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.