Legal Opinion
Heringer v. Haskell
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided August 29, 1995No. Civ. 950034PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEVINE, Justice.
Robert Heringer petitions this court for a supervisory writ directing the district court to disqualify Randall Bakke and the law firm of Smith, Bakke & Hovland from representing Michael Puklich in litigation against Her-inger. We grant the writ and direct the district court to disqualify Bakke and the firm from representing Puklich in this action.
The underlying dispute in this case is an action by Heringer against Puklich for negligence, professional malpractice and fraud. Puklich, a certified public accountant, provided accounting services and professional advice to Heringer…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Analytica, Incorporated v. Npd Research, Inc., Defendant-Cross-Appellant-Cross-Appellee. Appeals of Schwartz & Freeman and Pressman and Hartunian ChtdCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. KAWSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
- Burkes v. HalesCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
- First American Carriers, Inc. v. Kroger Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
- Burnette v. MorganSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Clinard v. BlackwoodTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
- Trinity Medical Center, Inc. v. HolumNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota v. BullisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Varriano v. BangNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Continental Resources, Inc. v. SchmalenbergerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.