Legal Opinion

City of Camas v. Kiggins

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 1922No. 16847PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, C. J.

— This is a prosecution by the plaintiff, a city of the third class, against the defendants, Kiggins and McGill, for an alleged violation by them of an ordinance of the city prescribing the fire limits therein and the kind of buildings that may be constructed within those limits. The ordinance (No. 95), after defining the fire limits, in so far as we need here notice its language, reads as follows:

‘ ‘ Section No. 5. All buildings which shall be erected within that part of the said fire-limits lying between Beeson and Columbia streets shall be built of fire proof material on the outside, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Spokane v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  2. State ex rel. Kiggins v. WoolsonWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  3. State ex rel. Kiggins v. HadleyWashington Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Williams v. TilayeWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  2. City of Seattle v. CrockettWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Valley v. HandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
  4. Gange Lumber Co. v. RowleyWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Hatfield v. STATE, DEPT. OF LICENSINGCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API