Legal Opinion

City of Seattle v. Crockett

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1976No. 44061PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDolliver, J.

This is an appeal from an order entered by the King County Superior Court dismissing defendant’s conviction in Seattle Municipal Court for illegally discharging a firearm in violation of a city ordinance. The conviction was dismissed due to an alleged failure to comply with CrR 3.3 (b): the defendant was not given a trial de novo within 90 days from the date his counsel requested and received a trial date from the clerk of the superior court.

The sole issue is whether the time limits of CrR 3.3 (b) have been met in an appeal to the superior court for a trial de novo where a person charged with…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. ParmeleWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  2. State v. ElizondoWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  3. State v. EstesWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  4. City of Camas v. KigginsWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  5. State v. SodorffWashington Supreme Court · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. BrettWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. MacKWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  3. City of Seattle v. GuayWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  4. City of Seattle v. GuayWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State v. TweedyMontana Supreme Court · 1996

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API