Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Kiggins v. Hadley

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1919No. 14929PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Clarke! county, Back, J., entered May 18, 1918, in favor of the defendant, dismissing an application for a writ of prohibition, upon sustaining a demurrer to the affidavit.

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

Appellants sought a writ of prohibition in the superior court of Clarke county, to prohibit the police judge of Camas, Washington, a city *649of the third class, from proceeding against relators for the recovery of a penalty in the sum of $300, for an alleged violation of one of the criminal ordinances of the city. This appeal arises out of the same case as that decided in State ex rel. Kiggins v. Woolson, 98 Wash. 505, 167 Pac. 1088. Thereafter, on January 10, 1918, defendants answered the complaint and filed the answer with Kelley Loe, who had succeeded Woolson as police justice. Both parties…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Nelson v. CampbellWashington Supreme Court · 1890
  2. State ex rel. Kiggins v. WoolsonWashington Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of Camas v. KigginsWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Pacific Coast Paper Mills v. Pacific Mercantile AgencyWashington Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API