Legal Opinion

City of Spokane v. Smith

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1905No. 5292PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from orders of the superior court for Spokane county, Richardson, J., entered April 7 and 11, 1904, requiring a city attorney to approve a cost bill for witness fees, and overruling the city’s objections to the jurisdiction.

1Opinion of the CourtHadley, J.

This appeal involves a proceeding in the nature of mandamus against the corporation counsel of the city of Spokane and his assistant. Respondent was arrested and tried before the police court of said city, on the charge of permitting an animal to run at large within the city limits, in violation of a city ordinance. He was found guilty in the police court, and a fine was assessed against him. He appealed to the superior court where, by the verdict of a jury, he was found not guilty. A cost bill was thereupon filed for the fees and mileage of respondent’s witnesses who attended upon the trial…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. City of Bellingham v. HiteWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  2. City of Seattle v. FilsonWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  3. City of Camas v. KigginsWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Marshall v. DunnWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  5. City of Minot v. WhitfieldNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API