Legal Opinion

Williams v. Tilaye

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 2012No. 85570-6PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChambers, J.

f This case involves two different statutory schemes awarding attorney fees. One scheme, RCW 7.06.050-.060, discourages frivolous appeals from mandatory arbitration. It does so by providing a penalty for parties that appeal a mandatory arbitration decision by requesting a trial de novo and do no better at the trial de novo than in arbitration. The other scheme, RCW 4.84.250-.300, encourages parties to settle before going to court in cases where the amount in controversy is $10,000 or less. It does so in part by allowing a plaintiff to recover attorney fees if the plaintiff makes an offer of…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. J.P.Washington Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State v. WentzWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State v. WentzWashington Supreme Court · 2003

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Berryman v. MetcalfCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  2. In re Pers. Restraint of Light-RothWashington Supreme Court · 2018
  3. State v. Arlene's Flowers, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2019
  4. AllianceOne Receivables Management, Inc. v. LewisWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Jessica M. Goodeill v. Madison Real EstateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API