Insurance Co. of North America v. Friedman Bros.
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Fannin. Tried below before Hon. D. H. Scott. The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
Stayton, Chief Justice.
Appellees, being judgment creditors of J. C. McDonald, caused an affidavit to be made that the Insurance Company of North America and another insurance company were indebted to McDonald, with a view to obtain a writ of garnishment. The affidavit did not state whether appellant or the other company was a corporation, joint stock association, or copartnership, but did allege that B. M. Burgher was the agent of each. The affidavit for garnishment should state such facts as would enable the officer who is called upon to issue the writ properly to issue it. Rev. Stats.,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Sun Mutual Insurance v. Geo. Seeligson & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1883
- Hebel v. Amazon InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
- Northern Central Railway Co. v. RiderCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1876
- C. & T. Schindler v. Smith, Bullins & Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1866
3Cited by28 opinions
- Mendoza v. Luke Fruia Investments, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1998
- First Nat. Bank of Jacksonville v. First State Bank of JacksonvilleTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
- Consolidated Gasoline Co. v. Jarecki Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1934
- Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. ChittimCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1902
- St. Louis, B. & M. Ry. Co. of Texas v. Dallas Cooperage & Woodenware Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1925
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.