Legal Opinion

St. Louis, B. & M. Ry. Co. of Texas v. Dallas Cooperage & Woodenware Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 17, 1925No. 9212PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJones, C. J.

This writ of error is prosecuted by the St. Louis, Brownsville & Mexico Railway' Company under the following state of facts:

Defendant in error, the Dallas Cooperage & Woodenware Company, denominated a trust estate with a number of individuals as trustees, and Dan A. Kivlen as one of these trustees, and also as manager and president, filed suit against a number of defendants in a district court in Dallas county, Tex., for the amount due on a promissory note in the principal sum of $2,197.97, together with interest at 8 per cent, per annum, and an additional amount of 10 per cent, for attorney…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Abilene Independent Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Insurance Co. of North America v. Friedman Bros.Texas Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Arcola Sugar Mills Co. v. DohertyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. v. EarnestCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  2. Zeecon Wireless Internet, LLC v. American Bank of Texas, N.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2010
  3. Lawyers Surety Corporation v. SevierCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
  4. Robinson v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  5. Whittinghill v. OliverCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API