Legal Opinion

Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. Chittim

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 17, 1902PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Maverick. Tried below before Hon. J. M. Goggin.

1Opinion of the Court

FLY, Associate Justice.

This is a suit for the sum of $36,693.37 damages alleged to have accrued .to appellee by the negligent burning of grass and fourteen miles of fence. A trial by jury resulted in a verdict and judgment for $28,357.72, in favor of appellee.

The grounds of negligence were as follows: “(a) In permitting broomweed, grass and other combustible growth to accumulate on its right of way as aforesaid; (b) in overloading the engines attached to and pulling the freight and passenger trains on said Eagle Pass branch at and about the time of the fire hereinbefore described, as…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Sheldon v. . the Hudson River Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1856
  2. Colton v. OnderdonkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. HorneTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Int. & G. N. R'y Co. v. TimmermannTexas Supreme Court · 1884

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Wichita Falls & N. W. Ry. Co. v. GantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co. v. BruneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  3. Sanders v. LefkovitzCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  4. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. PrudeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905
  5. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. DoddCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API