Sun Mutual Insurance v. Geo. Seeligson & Co.
Texas Supreme Court
Error from Galveston. Tried below before the Hon. Wm¡ H. Stewart.
1Opinion of the Court
Stayton, Associate Justice.—
It is true that there can be no valid judgment against a garnishee unless there be a judgment against *5the defendant, and for this reason a garnishee is entitled to have an inquiry made as to whether or not, when a court has assumed to render a judgment against a defendant, it had jurisdiction over his person and over the subject matter of the suit; for if it had not, the judgment against the garnishee will be no protection to him.
If, however, the court had jurisdiction of the person of the defendant and of the subject matter of the suit, then the garnishee cannot…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bard v. KleebWashington Supreme Court · 1890
- Bennett v. ChildWisconsin Supreme Court · 1865
- Thomason v. BishopTexas Supreme Court · 1859
- Janes v. LanghamTexas Supreme Court · 1867
- Crain v. GriffisTexas Supreme Court · 1855
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- G., H. & S. A. R'y Co. v. GageTexas Supreme Court · 1884
- Barton v. Montex CorporationCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. RawlinsTexas Supreme Court · 1891
- Insurance Co. of North America v. Friedman Bros.Texas Supreme Court · 1889
- Gerlach Mercantile Co. v. Hughes-Bozarth-Anderson Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1916
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.