Legal Opinion

Smith v. Rogers Group, Inc.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 18, 2002No. 01-1028PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Donald L. Corbin, Justice.

The central issue in this case is whether the acquired-immunity doctrine is still a viable defense in this state. The Faulkner County Circuit Court concluded that it is and granted summary judgment to Appellee Rogers Group, Inc., and its insurers, Appellees Hartford Fire Insurance Company and National Union Fire Insurance Company. This case stems from three automobile accidents that occurred on U.S. Highway 65 North, between Conway and Greenbrier. Appellants and their decedents brought suit against Rogers, as the contractor for the Arkansas Highway and Transportation…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Robinson v. BeaumontSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  2. Bushong v. Garman Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  3. Madden v. AldrichSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  4. Rogers v. Tudor InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  5. Wood v. Foster & Creighton Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1950

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Marlar v. DanielSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  2. Low v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  3. In Re Prempro Products Liability LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  4. Clayborn v. Bankers Standard InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  5. Van DeVeer v. RTJ, INC.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2003

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API