Legal Opinion
Glade v. Dietert
Texas Supreme Court
Decided October 24, 1956No. A-5756PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Culver
Respondents, Dietert and wife, recovered against petitioner, Glade, for damages to real property. The Court of Civil Appeals affirmed. 286 S.W. 2d 955.
The City of Fort Worth contracted with Glade to construct a storm sewer line through a residential section according to plans and specifications prepared by the City. The City was to furnish the right of way and it staked out the area along a *384gully or ravine within which the line was to be constructed. Construction by Glade progressed according to plans and specifications and reached respondents’ property on July 24, 1953. Glade entered thereon…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Yearsley v. W. A. Ross Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Brazos River Conservation & Reclamation District v. CostelloTexas Supreme Court · 1940
- Schooler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
- Nunnelly v. Southern Iron Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1895
- Wood v. Foster & Creighton Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1950
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Coastal Oil & Gas Corp. v. Garza Energy TrustTexas Supreme Court · 2008
- Brown & Gay Engineering, Inc. v. Zuleima Olivares, Individually and as the Representative of the Estate of Pedro Olivares, Jr., & Pedro OlivaresTexas Supreme Court · 2015
- Gregg v. Delhi-Taylor Oil Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1961
- White v. Natural Gas Pipeline Company of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1969
- Barnes v. MathisTexas Supreme Court · 2011
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.